Best session replay tools for AI coding agents (2026)
If you build a website with Claude Code and want to know why visitors leave without signing up, you need a tool that records real sessions and that your agent can act on. This page ranks 12 such tools for that buyer on six stated criteria: agent access, whether the tool hands the agent a change or a chart, free tier, first paid step, retention and where the data lives. UserProof is #1 because it is built around the second criterion and priced flat. In our check of 128 AI answers, PostHog was named in 105 and UserProof in 0, so this page is not ranking on popularity; the other 11 are ranked on the same criteria, and the “Short answer” table says which one to pick for a different job.
Jump to: short answer · how we compared · comparison table · the 12 tools · what AI answers name · FAQ
Short answer: UserProof is #1 for this buyer; the pick changes with the job
| If you | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| You build in Claude Code and want the agent handed one fix (the buyer this page ranks for) | UserProof (#1), then Harvv (#2) | UserProof is narrower, ties the fix to one goal and checks it afterward; Harvv is wider (traffic, Web Vitals, SEO). |
| You want to watch sessions for free | Microsoft Clarity | No cap stated and no paid tier. |
| You already use product analytics and want your agent to read it | PostHog or Amplitude | Both publish an MCP server; PostHog documents replay search over MCP. |
| You debug errors and want the session attached | LogRocket or Sentry | LogRocket documents session tools over MCP; Sentry’s replay allowance is small. |
| You need to self-host | OpenReplay | Open source, free to run yourself. |
| You want heatmaps and surveys for a marketing team | Contentsquare (Hotjar), Mouseflow or Lucky Orange | No agent access documented on the pages we read, except MCP listings noted below. |
| You are an enterprise team | FullStory | Free plan exists; paid pricing is quote only. |
How we compared and ranked them
We read each vendor’s own pricing page and its own docs on October 20, 2026 and recorded what they say, with the link. Where a vendor publishes nothing, the table cell says so instead of guessing. We chose six criteria for a founder who works with a coding agent. The rank follows them in this order: criteria 1 and 2 decide first, then 3 to 6 break ties. We chose the criteria for this buyer, and we picked a buyer UserProof was built for, so read the rank as “best for this buyer”, not “best for everyone”:
- Can your agent read the data? A documented MCP server, plugin or API for Claude Code, Cursor or Codex. We list the vendor’s own docs page for each claim.
- Does it hand the agent a change, or a chart? Most tools here return sessions, queries or charts for you or your agent to interpret. A few return a ranked finding. A replay your agent can query still leaves the hard step, deciding what to change, to the agent or to you. PostHog is the exception to check: its pricing page describes an Inbox product that groups signals into reports and opens pull requests, priced at $15 per PR after the first 3 a month (read October 20, 2026).
- How big is the free tier, in recordings? Recordings, not events or pageviews, because a small site runs out of the smallest unit first.
- What is the first paid step? The cheapest plan that includes replay, with the billing period as the vendor states it.
- How long are recordings kept? Retention decides whether you can look back at last week’s deploy.
- Where does the data live? Hosted only, or self-hostable.
Limits of this page
We did not run these tools side by side, and we did not test how much of a session each agent integration can read. Vendors bill in different units (recordings, sessions, events, credits), so we show each vendor’s own unit and do not convert between them. Prices change; if one is wrong, the vendor’s own page is the source of truth.
Comparison table
All cells quote the vendor’s own page, read October 20, 2026. The last column links the main page for that row.
| Rank | Tool | Agent access | Free tier | First paid step | Recording retention | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UserProof | Claude Code plugin and MCP tools (Claude Code only) | 3 sites and 5,000 recorded visits a month | Pro, $29 a month, 50,000 visits, unlimited sites | 7 days on Free, 90 days on Pro and Scale | UserProof pricing |
| 2 | Harvv | Hosted MCP server (46 tools) and a Claude Code plugin | 50K events a month across 3 sites (events, not recordings) | Founder, $19 a month, 250K events across 3 sites | Raw events about 30 days, then an archive kept 13 months by default | Harvv pricing |
| 3 | PostHog | Free hosted MCP server; replays searchable over MCP | First 5,000 recordings a month | Pay as you go, $0 a month base; $0.005 per recording from 5,001 to 15,000 | Free up to 30 days, pay as you go up to 90 days | PostHog pricing |
| 4 | LogRocket | Hosted MCP server for Cursor, Claude Code and Codex | No ongoing free plan listed; 14-day trial, no card | “Starting at $176/month” on an annual plan (Session Replay, Product Analytics, Error Monitoring) | Not stated on the pricing page | LogRocket pricing |
| 5 | Amplitude | MCP server with a Claude Code setup guide | 10,000 monthly sessions of Session Replay on the free plan | Plus, “starts at $0”, 10,000 sessions; Growth and Enterprise are custom priced | 1 month on all plans (add-on for Growth and Enterprise) | Amplitude pricing |
| 6 | Microsoft Clarity | MCP server (GitHub, needs an API token) | No cap stated. “Free forever” | None. Free only | 30 days; favorites and a sample up to 9 months | Clarity FAQ |
| 7 | Sentry | Hosted MCP server (replay coverage not confirmed) | Developer plan: 50 replays; new users get 5,000 free replays a month for 3 months | Team from $26 a month billed annually; 50 replays on the plan table | Not stated for replays | Sentry pricing |
| 8 | FullStory | MCP server (beta) | Free plan: 30,000 sessions a month, 12 months retention | Paid plans are quote only (“Request pricing & demo”) | 12 months on the free plan | FullStory pricing |
| 9 | OpenReplay | MCP app (docs describe use from AI chat hosts) | Self-hosted open source is free; no hosted free tier with a recording limit stated | Dedicated, “starting from” $199 a month, billed hourly ($0.276/hr) | Dedicated: no limits stated; table says “Custom” | OpenReplay pricing |
| 10 | Contentsquare (Hotjar) | MCP listed under AI and agents; included on the free plan per the Hotjar page | Free: 200k monthly sessions; replay captures 5% of sessions (max. 10k) | Growth, from $39 a month | Session replay access: 1 month on Free, 2 months on Growth | Contentsquare’s Hotjar page |
| 11 | Mouseflow | MCP server announced (plan requirements not confirmed) | Free Forever: 500 sessions a month | Essential, 25 a month, 5,000 sessions (no currency symbol in our fetch of the page) | Free 1 month, Essential 3 months | Mouseflow pricing |
| 12 | Lucky Orange | None found on its pricing page or help-center home | No free plan; 7-day free trial | Build, $32 a month billed annually, up to 3,500 sessions a month | Starts at 60 days; 90, 180 or 365 days available as upgrades | Lucky Orange pricing |
The 12 tools, ranked
1. UserProof
Ranked 1 on criterion 2: a Claude Code plugin whose output is one change tied to a goal, with the file and line and a check afterward, on flat plans at $29 and $99 a month. It is not the cheapest first step here (Sentry Team lists $26 a month and Mouseflow Essential 25 a month, currency unconfirmed). It ranks lower on retention (7 days on Free) and has the shortest track record here.
Best for: You want the agent handed one fix, with the file and line.
We publish this page, so read this section against our pricing page. UserProof (getuserproof.com) is not UseProof or Proof (useproof.com), a different company with different prices. UserProof is a Claude Code plugin plus a small JavaScript snippet. It records what real visitors do and finds dead clicks, rage clicks, errors on click and slow responses. It gives Claude Code the one change most likely to raise your conversion goal, with the file and line, then checks afterward whether the fix worked. The counts come from recorded events, never from an LLM, and typed text is never recorded.
Pick it if you build in Claude Code, have a single goal such as signups or bookings, and want one next step instead of a dashboard. Before any traffic arrives, it can scan your live site for broken elements and name the file and line.
Free is 3 sites and 5,000 recorded visits a month with recordings kept 7 days. Pro is $29 a month for unlimited sites and 50,000 visits with 90-day retention; Scale is $99 a month for 250,000 visits. Past a plan’s visits, UserProof keeps recording 1 in 4 visits until the month resets.
Where it is the wrong pick: It works with Claude Code only today; Codex and Cursor are not supported yet. It does not do heatmaps or surveys. It launched in October 2026 and has no track record next to Clarity, PostHog or FullStory. If you want a replay library for analysts to browse, pick one of the others.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: UserProof pricing; UserProof facts.
2. Harvv
Ranked 2: the same plugin-and-MCP approach as UserProof with a wider scope, but it counts events, and we found no statement about a session replay viewer.
Best for: You want the agent handed one fix, with the file and line.
Pick it if you want a Claude Code plugin that also covers traffic, Core Web Vitals and SEO findings. Harvv is the closest tool to UserProof in this list, and it is wider. Its site describes a hosted MCP server with 46 tools covering findings, traffic, conversions, Core Web Vitals and SEO. It also lists a Claude Code plugin and connectors for Slack, Claude and ChatGPT.
Its pricing page counts events and credits rather than recordings. Free is 50K events a month across 3 sites. Founder is $19 a month for 250K events across 3 sites, with extra events at $4 per 100K if you turn them on. Because it does not state a recording allowance, you cannot compare it with the others here on recordings per month. Its site says raw events are kept about 30 days and a compressed archive 13 months by default.
Where it is the wrong pick: We could not find a statement on its pages about whether it has a session replay viewer, so if watching sessions is the requirement, check before you pick it. If you want a narrow tool focused on one conversion goal and a check after the fix, UserProof is built around that.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: Harvv pricing; Harvv home page; Harvv MCP docs.
3. PostHog
Ranked 3: a documented MCP server with replay search and 5,000 free recordings a month, but it returns data and, through its Inbox product, pull requests priced per PR, not a single goal-tied fix with a check afterward.
Best for: You already use product analytics and want the agent to read it.
Pick it if you want replay inside a product analytics suite with feature flags, experiments and error tracking, billed on usage. The first 5,000 recordings a month are free. After that PostHog bills $0.005 per recording from 5,001 to 15,000 and $0.0035 per recording from 15,001 to 50,000, with no monthly minimum stated.
By our arithmetic from those published tiers, 50,000 recordings in a month comes to $172.50 (10,000 at $0.005 plus 35,000 at $0.0035, with the first 5,000 free). A “recording” on PostHog and a “recorded visit” on UserProof are close but not identical units, so treat that as a rough comparison, not a quote.
PostHog documents a hosted MCP server that works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and VS Code, and a separate docs page covers searching replays and managing playlists over MCP. Retention is set per plan: up to 30 days on Free and up to 90 on pay as you go, according to its replay retention page.
Where it is the wrong pick: The product is broad, so the setup has more to configure than a single-purpose tool. Its Inbox opens pull requests from grouped signals, billed per PR, but the pricing page does not say it ties one fix to a single conversion goal or checks afterward whether the goal moved. If you already run PostHog, try Inbox before adding another tool.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: PostHog pricing; PostHog replay retention; PostHog replay over MCP.
4. LogRocket
Ranked 4: a hosted MCP server for Cursor, Claude Code and Codex, but no ongoing free plan and a first paid step of $176 a month.
Best for: You debug errors with the session attached.
Pick it if the job is finding why something broke for a user and handing your agent the session that shows it. LogRocket publishes a hosted MCP server for Cursor, Claude Code and Codex. Its docs list tools to find sessions, watch sessions, read network entries, find issues and ask its Galileo AI, with OAuth or a project API key for access, and they say the tools are under active development and may change.
The pricing page says “Starting at $176/month” on an annual plan, covering session replay, product analytics and error monitoring, and does not tie that figure to a plan name or session count. It lists no ongoing free plan, only a free trial with no card. Self-hosting is listed under Enterprise with no price.
Where it is the wrong pick: The entry price is the highest of the self-serve tools here, and the page does not show what the entry price includes. A solo founder with a few thousand visitors will not use most of it.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: LogRocket pricing; LogRocket MCP docs.
5. Amplitude
Ranked 5: an MCP server with a Claude Code setup guide, but its page does not say replay data is available through it.
Best for: You already use product analytics and want the agent to read it.
Pick it if your team already measures with events and cohorts and wants replay next to them. Amplitude’s pricing page lists Session Replay at 10,000 monthly sessions on Free and Plus and 20,000 on Growth, with an add-on for more. Plus is shown as “Starts at $0” and bills on events; the page gives no dollar price beyond that.
Amplitude publishes an MCP server with setup steps for Claude Code. The page says it queries charts, dashboards, experiments and cohorts. It does not say that session replay data is available through it, so confirm that before you plan around it.
Replay retention is 1 month on every plan. Amplitude’s own docs say replay shows individual user experiences and point to Analytics or Heatmaps for aggregate behavior.
Where it is the wrong pick: Replay is one feature of a large analytics product, so a solo founder pays attention to events and plans they may not need. Retention is short.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: Amplitude pricing; Amplitude MCP for Claude Code.
6. Microsoft Clarity
Ranked 6: the best free tier here (no cap stated) and an MCP server, but it gives your agent sessions to read, not a change to make.
Best for: Free, and you only need to watch sessions.
Pick it if you want to watch sessions and look at heatmaps and do not want a bill. Clarity’s FAQ says it is “100% free - forever” and that you are “never asked to upgrade to a paid version”. The home page says there are no traffic limits.
For an agent, Microsoft publishes an open-source MCP server. Its README says it gives MCP-compatible clients access to your session recordings, project analytics and documentation, and it needs Node.js and a Clarity API token. We did not test how much of a session an agent can read through it.
Recordings are kept 30 days, except favorites and a random sample, which are kept up to 9 months (FAQ, last updated October 16, 2026).
Where it is the wrong pick: It has no paid tier, so there is nobody to call when something breaks, and nothing in its documentation says it picks one change for your agent to make. You read the sessions and decide.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: Clarity FAQ; Clarity MCP server README.
7. Sentry
Ranked 7: an MCP server and replay attached to errors, but a small replay allowance (50 on the Developer plan).
Best for: You debug errors with the session attached.
Pick it if you already run Sentry for errors and want a replay attached to an issue. Session Replay sits inside Sentry’s plans: the plan table shows 50 replays on Developer and Team, and a banner offers new users 5,000 free replays a month for their first 3 months. Team is shown from $26 a month when billed annually.
Sentry publishes a hosted MCP server for error search, performance analysis and issue triage. The page we read does not mention replays, so we cannot say whether an agent can read them through it.
Where it is the wrong pick: It is an error monitor first. If your problem is visitors who do not convert and nothing is throwing an error, replay allowances of 50 will not tell you much.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: Sentry pricing; Sentry MCP.
8. FullStory
Ranked 8: a generous free plan (30,000 sessions) and a beta MCP server, but paid pricing is quote only.
Best for: You are an enterprise team with a budget.
Pick it if you have a team, a budget and a need for a mature digital experience platform. FullStory’s pricing page lists a free plan with 30,000 sessions a month and 12 months of data retention. Its paid plans send you to “Request pricing & demo”, so there is no public price to put in a table.
FullStory publishes an MCP server, marked beta, that connects an AI assistant to its product data, and it requires MCP to be enabled for the organization.
Where it is the wrong pick: Paid pricing is not published, which makes it hard to plan a budget before a sales call.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: FullStory pricing; FullStory MCP docs.
9. OpenReplay
Ranked 9: the only self-hostable option, but the hosted plan starts at $199 a month and the MCP app targets chat hosts.
Best for: You need to self-host.
Pick it if recordings have to stay on your own infrastructure. OpenReplay’s pricing page says the open-source edition is free if you host it on your own infrastructure, and it gives no session or feature limits. The managed Dedicated plan starts from $199 a month, billed hourly at $0.276 an hour. A serverless option is described as usage-based, with no price shown.
Its docs describe an MCP app for querying session replays, charts, funnels and user journeys from an AI chat host such as Claude Desktop. Check its docs for the agent you use.
Where it is the wrong pick: Self-hosting means you run it. The cheapest hosted option on the page is $199 a month, which is a lot for a small site.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: OpenReplay pricing; OpenReplay MCP docs.
10. Contentsquare (Hotjar)
Ranked 10: heatmaps and surveys on every plan and an MCP allowance on Free, but built for marketing and UX teams, with replay capped at 5% of sessions on Free.
Best for: You want heatmaps and surveys, and a marketing team to use them.
Pick it if you want the Hotjar combination of heatmaps, recordings and surveys. Contentsquare’s Hotjar page says: “It’s no longer possible to create a new account on Hotjar. New users can sign up for free on Contentsquare.” So a new buyer is choosing a Contentsquare plan.
The Free plan is shown as 200k monthly sessions at $0 forever, with replays, heatmaps and funnels. Its plan table is more specific about replays: monthly session replay capture on Free is 5% of sessions with a maximum of 10k, and session replay access is 1 month. Growth is shown from $39 a month (the page also shows $49 struck through) and captures 15% of sessions, with replay access of 2 months.
The Hotjar page lists “Connect your favorite AI assistant (MCP)” among the free-plan features. We did not read the MCP docs.
Where it is the wrong pick: Replay on the free plan is a 5% sample, so a small site may see too few sessions to find a pattern. The product is aimed at marketing and UX teams, and nothing on the pages we read says it chooses one change for an agent.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: Contentsquare’s Hotjar page; Contentsquare pricing.
11. Mouseflow
Ranked 11: a 500-session free plan and an announced MCP server whose plan requirements we could not confirm.
Best for: You want heatmaps and surveys, and a marketing team to use them.
Pick it if you want recordings plus heatmaps, funnels and form analytics from a single vendor and your traffic is small. Mouseflow’s pricing page lists a Free Forever plan at 500 sessions a month, Essential at 25 a month with 5,000 sessions, Advanced at 109 and Premium at 319. The page text we read did not show a currency symbol, so check it on the page before you budget.
Retention is 1 month on Free and 3 months on Essential. Mouseflow has a page for an MCP server. We could not match its plan requirements to the current plan names, so confirm that you can use it on the plan you buy.
Where it is the wrong pick: The free plan holds 500 sessions a month, which a site with any traffic will pass in days. Agent access may need a higher plan.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: Mouseflow pricing; Mouseflow MCP page.
12. Lucky Orange
Ranked 12: no free plan and no agent access found on the pages we read.
Best for: You want heatmaps and surveys, and a marketing team to use them.
Pick it if you want a paid, session-based behavior tool with recordings on every plan and plans sized by monthly sessions. The pricing page shows Build at $32 a month billed annually for up to 3,500 sessions, Grow at $72 for 10,000, Expand at $199 starting at 50,000 sessions and Scale at $839 starting at 300,000. There is a 7-day free trial and no permanent free plan. Extra websites are $5 each.
Retention starts at 60 days, with 90, 180 or 365 days available. We looked for an MCP server or agent integration on its pricing page and help-center home and found none. That is absence of evidence, so check its docs.
Where it is the wrong pick: No free plan, and nothing we found connects it to a coding agent.
Sources, checked October 20, 2026: Lucky Orange pricing.
Smartlook is not on the list because its own site says it stopped selling: no new paid subscriptions after May 31, 2026, no renewals after August 31, 2026, and the platform is decommissioned on September 30, 2027. We also did not cover Quantum Metric, Glassbox, Datadog, Dynatrace, Rybbit, UXCam, Heap, Pendo or Userpilot this time. Several of those publish their own best-of lists that AI answers cite.
Head-to-head pages
Three of the most searched tools have their own page with cost at real volumes and a “where they still win” section: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity and PostHog. For who we are, see About UserProof.
What AI answers name for these questions
We asked four AI engines the buyer questions behind this page and counted which tools the answers named. This is our own data, run on October 20, 2026: 17 prompts, two runs each, across ChatGPT (chat-latest), Claude (Sonnet 5.5), Gemini (3.8 Flash) and Perplexity (Sonar), with web search on in every engine. That produced 128 answers that completed. Grok was not run because its account had no credits. Names are counted when the tool appears in the answer text.
Four of the prompts ask about AI coding agents without naming a vendor (for example, “What are the best tools that let an AI coding agent analyze real user behavior on my website?”). Those gave 32 answers:
| Tool | Answers naming it |
|---|---|
| PostHog | 26 of 32 |
| LogRocket | 19 of 32 |
| FullStory | 17 of 32 |
| Sentry | 15 of 32 |
| Amplitude | 10 of 32 |
| Microsoft Clarity | 10 of 32 |
| OpenReplay | 7 of 32 |
| Harvv | 2 of 32 |
| UserProof | 0 of 32 |
Across all 128 answers, including prompts that name a vendor such as Hotjar or FullStory, the most named tools were PostHog (105 answers), Microsoft Clarity (98), FullStory (90), LogRocket (86) and Hotjar (85). UserProof was named in 0 of 128, and Harvv in 2. The most cited pages in those answers were session replay roundups published by Quantum Metric (19 answers), thefrontkit.com (13), Amplitude (13) and Motadata (13). Most pages in that group are written by a vendor that places itself first.
Those lists put their publisher first, and so does this one, so we state the buyer, the criteria and the date, and we link every vendor fact to the vendor. A list published by one of its entries needs to show its work. Counts were made by matching tool names in answer text and are one run on one day; AI answers change from day to day, so read them as a snapshot.
FAQ
What is the best session replay tool for AI coding agents?
For a founder who builds in Claude Code and wants the agent handed one fix, we rank UserProof #1 and Harvv #2. For other jobs: Microsoft Clarity to watch sessions for free, PostHog or Amplitude for replay next to product analytics your agent can query, LogRocket or Sentry to debug errors with the session attached. We publish this page and rank ourselves first, so check each claim against the vendor’s own page linked in its section.
Can Claude Code read session recordings?
Through an MCP server or plugin, yes. PostHog, Amplitude, LogRocket, Sentry, OpenReplay, Microsoft Clarity, FullStory and Harvv publish one, and UserProof is a Claude Code plugin. What the agent can read differs by vendor, so check each vendor’s docs. We did not test every integration.
Is there a free session replay tool?
Microsoft Clarity is free with no cap stated. PostHog gives the first 5,000 recordings a month free. FullStory’s free plan includes 30,000 sessions a month and Amplitude’s 10,000. UserProof’s Free plan is 3 sites and 5,000 recorded visits a month. Contentsquare’s free plan captures 5% of sessions up to 10k.
Why does the table show different units?
Vendors bill on different things: recordings, sessions, events or credits. We show each vendor’s own unit and do not convert between them, because the conversions would be our estimates. Where we did arithmetic on published tiers, the text says so.
Do these tools capture what visitors type?
That differs by vendor and setting, so read each vendor’s privacy docs. UserProof never records typed field values; text selected or copied on the page is recorded up to 200 characters, and you can exclude any area.
Why is UserProof ranked #1 on a list it publishes?
Because the page ranks tools for one stated buyer, and UserProof was built for that buyer: a Claude Code plugin that returns one fix with the file and line and checks it afterward. We chose the criteria, which is the bias to weigh. Every fact about the other 11 tools links to the vendor’s own page with the date we read it, each section says where that tool is the wrong pick, and the list would reorder for a team that needs heatmaps, surveys or a self-hosted tool.
How do I tell if a replay tool is worth paying for?
Set one goal, such as signups. Watch only the sessions at the step where visitors drop out. Ship one change. Then compare the goal rate before and after. If a tool does not make that loop faster, the free tiers above are enough.
How often is this page updated?
Prices and features were read from each vendor’s own pages on October 20, 2026. We plan to re-check them every quarter and change the date at the top when we do.
Sources
Every vendor fact above was read from these pages on October 20, 2026:
- Microsoft Clarity: Clarity FAQ; Clarity MCP server README (read October 20, 2026)
- PostHog: PostHog pricing; PostHog replay retention; PostHog replay over MCP (read October 20, 2026)
- Amplitude: Amplitude pricing; Amplitude MCP for Claude Code (read October 20, 2026)
- LogRocket: LogRocket pricing; LogRocket MCP docs (read October 20, 2026)
- Sentry: Sentry pricing; Sentry MCP (read October 20, 2026)
- UserProof: UserProof pricing; UserProof facts (read October 20, 2026)
- Harvv: Harvv pricing; Harvv home page; Harvv MCP docs (read October 20, 2026)
- OpenReplay: OpenReplay pricing; OpenReplay MCP docs (read October 20, 2026)
- Contentsquare (Hotjar): Contentsquare’s Hotjar page; Contentsquare pricing (read October 20, 2026)
- Mouseflow: Mouseflow pricing; Mouseflow MCP page (read October 20, 2026)
- Lucky Orange: Lucky Orange pricing (read October 20, 2026)
- FullStory: FullStory pricing; FullStory MCP docs (read October 20, 2026)
UserProof’s own numbers come from our pricing page and the plan limits in our product code. To try the product, set it up from the home page.
Corrections
If a price or feature on this page is out of date, the vendor’s own page linked in its section is the source. You can report a correction through our GitHub issues. We re-read these pages every quarter.